Comparison

ICHRA vs. QSEHRA vs. Traditional Group Health

Three different ways to fund employee health coverage, each fitting a different kind of employer. Here's how they actually differ.

FeatureICHRAQSEHRATraditional Group Plan
Employer size limitNoneUnder 50 full-time employeesNone (small vs. large group rules apply)
Federal contribution capNoneYes — IRS sets annual limitsN/A — employer selects plan(s)
Minimum participation requirementNoneNoneTypically yes (often 70–75%)
Can vary contribution by employee classYes, by permitted classesLimited (family status only)Generally no — uniform within eligible group
Employee plan choiceEmployee chooses individual market planEmployee chooses individual market planEmployer selects plan design(s)
Can be offered alongside a group planOnly to different classes, not the same classNo — employer can't also offer a group planN/A
Cost predictability for employerFixed, budgetable per classFixed, budgetable, cappedVariable — driven by claims experience at renewal

Choose ICHRA if...

You're any size employer with a workforce that doesn't fit a uniform group plan — seasonal, multi-location, or a mix of full-time and part-time staff — and you want to set different contribution levels by employee class.

Choose QSEHRA if...

You have fewer than 50 full-time employees, don't want the administrative complexity of class design, and are comfortable with the IRS's annual contribution caps.

Choose group health if...

You have a large, relatively stable eligible workforce, want to select and manage plan design directly, and can absorb renewal-driven cost variability.

Not sure which fits your business?

We work across all three structures — happy to walk through which makes sense for your specific workforce.

Contact Us